Report: US Soldiers Bringing Their Violence Home from Overseas January 20, 2012
Posted by rogerhollander in Iraq and Afghanistan, War.Tags: Afghanistan War, domestic violence, general peter chiarelli, Iraq war, ptsd, roger hollander, soldiers, veterans, war
add a comment
After Ten Years of War Sex Crimes, Domestic Abuse, and Suicide on the Rise for US Soldiers
After more than ten years at war, soldiers in the US military are more prone to sexual violence, domestic abuse (including spousal and child abuse), and suicide, according to a report released by the Pentagon on Thursday.

In this file photo, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta speaks at the Pentagon. The Pentagon is preparing a series of new initiatives to try to curb sexual assaults in the military, Panetta said Wednesday, calling the problem a stain on the honor of the armed forces. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP) Reuters reports:
Violent sex crimes committed by active U.S. Army soldiers have almost doubled over the past five years, due in part to the trauma of war, according to an Army report released on Thursday.
Reported violent sex crimes increased by 90 percent over the five-year period from 2006 to 2011. There were 2,811 violent felonies in 2011, nearly half of which were violent felony sex crimes. Most were committed in the United States.
One violent sex crime was committed by a soldier every six hours and 40 minutes in 2011, the Army said, serving as the main driver for an overall increase in violent felony crimes.
The report acknowledges that post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD) and other scars from long or repeated deployments are clearly contributed factors to the resulting violence, as the Reuters‘ report indicates:
Soldiers suffering from issues such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury, and depression have been shown to have higher incidences of partner abuse, according to the report.
Soldiers with PTSD are up to three times more likely to be aggressive with their female partners than those without such trauma, the report said.
The report also said that family abuse cases are typically underreported.
As the largest branch of the U.S. armed forces, the Army has done the bulk of the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, including years of extended duty and repeated deployments.
Stars & Stripes, the magazine for the US Armed Services, suggests that even as the wars wind down, the rate of violence at home likely may not:
One violent sex crime was committed by a soldier every six hours and 40 minutes in 2011, the Army said, serving as the main driver for an overall increase in violent felony crimes.
Though troops have left Iraq and an Afghanistan withdrawal is planned, the health and psychological problems will continue, and in some cases could even increase as veterans enter the civilian world, Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Chiarelli said. The Army will stay on top of them, he promised.
And though unreported violence against other service members and family members means that few of the Pentagon numbers can be deemed accurate – a fact the Pentagon acknowledges – they do think some of the rising rates of reported violence have been impacted not only by increased stress, but also by increased openness in the military system. According to the Christian Science Monitor:
General Peter Chiarelli, the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army… said that one reason sex crimes figures may have increased “so dramatically” in the past five years is that troops feel more comfortable coming forward to report the crime.
The Army study indicates that the vast majority (97 percent) of perpetrators “at least casually” know their attacker. Both the victims and perpetrators of sex crimes tend to be among the youngest soldiers.
And the New York Times highlighted the continued rise in the suicide rate among soldiers, noting:
Suicides among active-duty soldiers hit another record high in 2011, Army officials said on Thursday, although there was a slight decrease if nonmobilized Reserve and National Guard troops were included in the calculation.
Soldiers Speak Our on Memorial Day: Remember Sgt. Kirkland! May 30, 2011
Posted by rogerhollander in Iraq and Afghanistan, War.Tags: Afghanistan, Afghanistan War, answer coalition, derrick kirkland, Iraq, Iraq war, march forward, memorial day, ptsd, roger hollander, Sgt. Kirkland, soldiers, spc andrew bussy, spc cary ellis, spc joseph chroniger, ssg kevin baker, suicide, va, veterans administration, war casualties
add a comment
No
more deaths from Wall Street’s wars!’
| In their own words |
| SSG Kevin Baker ![]() Our |
| SPC Joseph Chroniger ![]() My |
| SPC Andrew Bussy There |
| SPC Cary Ellis ![]() Our |
| Anonymous Staff Sergeant ![]() I’ve |
The following is a statement from veterans and
active-duty troops in the organization March
Forward!, an affiliate of the ANSWER Coalition.
On Memorial Day, we are asked to remember those who
have died in Washington’s wars. Of course, we’re only asked to remember the
lives of U.S. troops; the lives of civilians killed in the current wars are
supposed to not exist. As veterans, we know the human toll all too well, and
cannot forget the more than one million innocent Iraqis, and the tens of
thousands of Afghans, including an entire home just obliterated yesterday by
NATO that killed ten children–cut from life before it had even begun.
In the United States, there are many families who
will be mourning a loved one this Memorial Day: over 6,000 U.S. troops have been
killed in Iraq and Afghanistan in the past ten years. That number is climbing by
the day as casualties hit record numbers in the hopeless Afghanistan war, and
troops continue to be killed in the “ended” Iraq war.
Donate
today to March Forward! Support a movement of anti-war veterans and service
members.
But what this government doesn’t want us to remember
is the record number of troops who have lost their lives to suicide. They, too,
are victims of the U.S. military’s wars. Over the past two years, more
active-duty troops have killed themselves than have been killed in combat.
Outside the military, veterans commit suicide at a rate of 18 per day.
This epidemic is the result of criminally negligent
mental health care from the U.S. military and Veterans Affairs—but no matter how
much the mental health care system is improved, it doesn’t stop the constant
flow of thousands of young people who are sent to be traumatized in the first
place in two imperial wars. A recent study found that now 80 percent of soldiers
and Marines have witnessed a friend killed or wounded in combat. Morale is down
the drain.
Under these conditions, the wave of suicides can only
get worse.
Active-duty troops are standing up and fighting back.
This Memorial Day, let’s remember those killed by the U.S. government’s actions,
and honor those who are memorializing a fellow soldier by speaking out and
fighting to punish those responsible for his death.
Sgt. Derrick Kirkland, from 4-9 Infantry at Fort
Lewis, Wash., deployed to Iraq twice. He was rated a “low risk” for suicide
after three consecutive suicide attempts, was publicly ridiculed for seeking
help by his superiors, then placed in a barracks room alone in violation of Army
regulations. Days later he killed himself, on March 19, 2010.
Kirkland’s mother, Mary Corkhill, told March
Forward!: “the Army has massively failed him … I am very angry at the Army and I
feel they killed my son.”
Click
here to read the powerful interview with Sgt. Kirkland’s mother.
March Forward! members in 4-9 Infantry immediately
sprung into action upon his death to expose those responsible. They have been
heroically organizing and speaking out. They are still working today to expose
Sgt. Kirkland’s case and the criminal treatment given to all troops, and to
organize against the wars.
You can help their voices be heard by signing their
petition and circulating their statements widely.
Click
here to sign the petition demanding justice for Sgt. Kirkland.
Help build the campaign to win justice for Sgt.
Kirkland, to hold the government accountable for their mistreatment of
traumatised soldiers, and to end the wars!
For more on the Kirkland
campaign:
Click
to read a speech given on the anniversary of Kirkland’s death.
Redeployment to Iraq Continues, but Not Without a Fight September 8, 2010
Posted by rogerhollander in Iraq and Afghanistan, War.Tags: disabled veterans, fort hood, Iraq, iraq redeployment, Iraq war, madeleine dubus, ptsd, redeployment, roger hollander, stop-loss, unde the hood, veterans
add a comment
Wednesday 08 September 2010
by: Madeleine Dubus, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

(Photo: DVIDSHUB / Flickr)
Despite the president’s pledge to end the war in Iraq within the month, one regiment awaits its redeployment and inspires a call to action.
While addressing the national convention of the Disabled American Veterans in Atlanta on Aug. 2, President Barack Obama said, “Our commitment in Iraq is changing from a military effort,” and all combat operations will cease by the end of the month. But in Killeen, Texas, the run-down military town that sits just outside the gates of Fort Hood, the largest active-duty military base in the United States, the reality of the Iraq war stands in direct opposition with Obama’s proclamations.
Within a week, the over 5,000 soldiers of Fort Hood’s 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment (ACR) will redeploy to Iraq for the fourth time since the war began. Deployment is set for sometime around August 25 (exact deployment dates aren’t allowed to be released to the public).
Members of the Fort Hood war resistance community see 3rd ACR as a paradigm for what plagues our military: repeated deployments leading to high rates of physically and mentally wounded soldiers suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), and Military Sexual Trauma (MST).
The psychological consequences of the wars among soldiers are rampant. PTSD has received the most official documentation, but it is important to be aware that TBI is the leading injury among Iraq veterans, usually caused by the leading cause of death in Iraq, Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), and one in three women in the military are raped.
In September 2009, the number of veterans who were diagnosed and treated for PTSD through the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) was 508,000, up from 480,000 only a few months earlier in June 2009. To receive full benefits from the VA, a veteran has to have finished his military contract and received an honorable discharge. But soldiers who have returned from a tour, yet are still active-duty and suffering from PTSD, must rely on the mental health services on base. The issue here, however, is that many cases of PTSD in active-duty soldiers go undiagnosed in order to keep troops deployable. This, paired with the shortage of mental health professionals on bases, leads to an Army full of heavily medicated, psychologically unstable men and women.
“A lot of them are diagnosed [with psychological and/or physical conditions] but [the chain of command] is fighting to get them not diagnosed,” says Cindy Thomas, the director of Killeen’s Under the Hood Café. Thomas started Under the Hood in March 2009 as a place for active-duty soldiers, veterans, as well as their friends, family, and supporters to gather for community and advice when facing the challenges of military and post-war life. It’s a place for soldiers to seek help when resisting orders to deploy, including dealing with its legal and personal consequences. Those who frequent Under the Hood regularly plan demonstrations aimed at pushing for the end of the wars.
Most importantly, Under the Hood is a safe place for soldiers to hang out and talk. Thomas sees soldiers coming in almost daily describing their experiences with redeployment while suffering from physical and mental wounds. Often, soldiers seek medical and psychological help at Fort Hood only to be ignored: they are either not seen by doctors or they wait for hours to be seen for only a couple of minutes and told they’re fit to deploy. Thomas recalls a soldier she knew a few years ago with a broken knee, who went undiagnosed and untreated for over two years in Fort Hood. He later needed to get reconstructive surgery because the damage from his untreated injury was so severe.
The redeployment of the 3rd ACR has served as a call to action for the war resistance movement in Fort Hood. On July 30, Under the Hood organized a protest at the East gate of the base, demanding that 3rd ACR’s Col. Reginald Allen choose not to deploy wounded soldiers, but it received no coverage from the local news media.
Thomas later found out that commanders on base have pressured the local papers and TV stations to stop covering Under the Hood. In response, they launched a Livestream channel which airs three, 30-minute webcasts per week and organized a phone campaign called “Harass the Brass,” releasing the office telephone numbers of every officer in 3rd ACR’s chain of command via Facebook. The “Harass the Brass” campaign is designed to get concerned citizens and the military community to come together to call those in charge to ask why wounded soldiers are getting deployed. It could be a major step in reminding Americans of their power to create change.
“This does affect everyone,” Thomas says. “These soldiers that are not being taken care of are going to be in the civilian sector when they get out. And after each deployment it gets worse, [our soldiers] deploy two, three, four, [or] five times and are not given the time to recover – you never recover from PTSD. They’re going to be your neighbors.”
During Under the Hood’s Aug. 7 webcast, participants in the campaign were encouraged to call every day until the estimated date of deployment.
“The military operates with our money, in our name,” says Bobby Whittenberg, an activist and Purple Heart veteran of the Iraq war who organizes at Under the Hood, during the webcast. “We have every right to hold them accountable … not caring, not checking into things like this is how you allow things to continue – how you allow people to run rampant with these ridiculous policies of ignoring soldiers medical needs, ignoring families.”
“We’re not even asking people to be nice,” adds Matthis Chiroux, an activist, Iraq war resister, and veteran of Afghanistan, on the webcast. “This is a great way, simply, to be heard. These people are making awful decisions in all of our names that are violating law, if not just the dictates of conscience.”
According to Thomas, even if a soldier is diagnosed with a physical or mental condition that could be damaging to his or her long-term health and ability to deploy, ultimately, who stays and who goes is up to the commanders, since they can wield authority over any doctor’s recommendation.
When I spoke to a Sgt. Major in 3rd ACR to discuss this issue [name withheld since he was not authorized to speak to the press], he confirmed that Army Regulations prohibit deploying any soldier who has been diagnosed with a physical or mental condition which makes them unfit to fight, but the doctors first speak to the commanders and then the commanders decide if the soldier can go.
Under the Hood and the rest of Fort Hood’s war resistance community hope that by working to prevent this deployment, they will not only help 3rd ACR’s wounded soldiers and take a step toward ending the wars, but they will inspire a national trend that will save other active-duty soldiers who are suffering.
“Only civilians can do this,” Chiroux says in an interview after the webcast. “We can’t ask active-duty soldiers to call up their commanders and harass them. Civilians have to do this on behalf of soldiers.”
Over seven years into the Iraq war, the damaged lives of both Iraqi civilians and American soldiers are evident. But it is also clear that from this destruction, a new movement is growing, and with it an opportunity to abandon the former state of the Iraq war and the military’s treatment of soldiers to create something new and ardent. Fort Hood is just the beginning.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.
War Crazy December 24, 2008
Posted by rogerhollander in Uncategorized, War.Tags: battlefatigue, camilo bica, crimes against humanity, patriotism, ptsd, roger hollander, shell shock, vietnam, war, war crazy
1 comment so far
“BUMPER-STICKER BRAVADO”
“YELLOW RIBBON PATRIOTISM”
24 December 200824 December 2008 I have always thought myself a free spirit, a philosopher mendicant, seeking an alternative, more substantive lifestyle. Others, however, see my unorthodoxy, my “spiritual seeking,” as abnormal and a clear indication of my insanity. Perhaps I need to pause and reevaluate my life. After all, being insane is not something one readily admits. I guess it’s part of being crazy to cling to a facade of sanity, to think oneself normal and everyone else insane.
One thing I am certain of, however. I haven’t always been crazy. Wasn’t born crazy. I think insanity crept up on me, happened in Vietnam, in the war. War does that, you know, drives people crazy. Shell shock, battle fatigue, soldier’s heart, PTSD. All that killing and dying can make anyone crazy.
Some survive war quite well, they tell me. Manvy even benefit from its virtues. But war’s effects are not always apparent. No one escapes war unscathed in body and in mind. All war, any war, every war, ain’t no virtue in war.
I think, of those not driven crazy by war, many were crazy already. But theirs was an insanity of a different kind, a hard kind, an uncaring kind. I knew people like that. Didn’t like them much. Thought them fortunate, though, as killing and dying meant nothing. In fact, in a perverse way, they enjoyed it, enjoyed the jazz, the excitement, the power. They became avenging angels, even god herself, making decisions of life and death, but mostly death. Those crazies hated to see the war end. For me, the war never ends.
Sometimes things work out for the best, though, as my unorthodoxy, my being crazy, probably saved my life. You see, sane people can’t live like this, in a war that never ends. Not all crazy people can either. Guess I was lucky. Sometimes being crazy helps you cope. Sometimes I wish I were crazier than I am.
Serious introspection has made clear the basis of my unorthodoxy, the nature of my insanity. It is a cruel wisdom allowing – no, better, compelling – a clarity of vision. I have seen the horror of war, the futility and the waste. I have endured the hypocrisy and arrogance of the influential and the wealthy, and have tolerated the ignorance and narrow-mindedness of the compliant and the easily led. War’s malevolent benefactors, who pretend and profess their patriotism with bumper-sticker bravado, with word but not deed, intoxicated by war’s hysteria, from a safe distance. Appreciative of our sacrifices, they claim, as they applaud the impending slaughter, sanctioning by word, or action, or non-action sending other men and women to be killed, and maimed, and driven crazy by war.
And when they benefit from the carnage no longer, their yellow ribbon patriotism and shallow concern fade quickly to apathy and indifference. The living refuse of war that returns are heroes no longer, but outcasts and derelicts, and burdens on the economy. The dead, they mythologize with memorials and speeches of past and future suffering and loss. Inspiring and prophetic words by those who sanction the slaughter to those who know nothing of sacrifice.
I used to try to explain war to help them understand and to know its horror, naively believing that war was a deficiency of information, understanding, discernment and vision. But being crazy has liberated me, allowing me to see that war is not a deficiency at all, but an excess of greed, ambition, intolerance and lust for power. And we are its instruments, the cannon fodder, expendable commodities in the ruthless pursuit of wealth, power, hegemony and empire.
And now, I accept and celebrate my unorthodoxy, my insanity, as an indictment of the hypocrites and the arrogant, of the ignorant and the narrow-minded for a collective responsibility and guilt for murder and mayhem, and crimes against humanity. And I offer my insanity as a presage of their future accountability – to humankind in the courts of history, and to the god they invoke so often to sanction and make credible their sacrilege of war.
by: Camillo “Mac” Bica, t r u t h o u t | Perspective
by: Camillo “Mac” Bica, t r u t h o u t | Perspective





Meet an officer who has been killing soldiers at Ft. Lewis February 24, 2012
Posted by rogerhollander in Health, Iraq and Afghanistan, War.Tags: Afghanistan War, dallas homas, fort lewis, ft. lewis, Iraq war, kevin baker, march forward, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, ptsd, roger hollander, soldier suicides, veterans
add a comment
ROGER’S NOTE: I DEDICATE THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE TO THOSE REPUBLICAN (AND DEMOCRATS LIKE HILLARY CLINTON) CHICKEN HAWKS WHO FROM THE SAFETY OF THEIR MANSIONS SEND AMERICAN MEN AND WOMEN OUT TO KILL AND DIE, AND TO ALL THOSE SUPER PATRIOTS WHO DRIVE AROUND WITH “SUPPORT OUR TROOPS” BUMPER STICKERS ON THEIR CARS.
Subscribe Send to a friend Donate Problems viewing this? Click here
PTSD misdiagnosis scandal leads to firings
BY KEVIN BAKER
The author is a former infantry Staff Sergeant—with 28 months in Iraq—who was stationed at Ft. Lewis and went through the medical discharge process at Madigan Healthcare System.
Col. Dallas Homas was administratively removed from his position as head of the Army’s Madigan Healthcare System near Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state, Army officials announced Feb. 20. Col. Homas, a West Point graduate, had headed the medical center since March 2011.
Col. Homas was removed during an Army inquiry into the practice of intentionally not diagnosing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in soldiers. Such a diagnosis entitles one to certain rights, benefits and compensation.
Col. Homas, the commander in charge of making sure soldiers on base are being cared for, denied soldiers their right to medical treatment and other rights to “save taxpayer money”—an absurd statement considering the multi-million dollar defense budget that has unlimited funds for corporate defense contractors, but suddenly “not enough money” when we’re entitled to compensation for legitimate psychological wounds.
Just weeks earlier, two top doctors in charge of PTSD at Ft. Lewis were also fired.
Already, as a result of the inquiry, 14 soldiers have been diagnosed with PTSD after having been being previously misdiagnosed. There is no telling how many more received a bogus diagnosis and are now in Afghanistan, not receiving the treatment they need, and not being awarded the disability and compensation they deserve.
And with record suicides in the Army over the past 3 years—many of which occurred among Ft. Lewis soldiers—it is undeniable that Col. Homas and all other officers and doctors involved in this process have blood on their hands.
Changes a result of public pressure for soldiers, military families, vets
Col. Homas has been removed not because the Army cares about our lives, but because of external pressure. Over the past two years, March Forward! has launched campaign after campaign against the inadequate treatment of soldiers suffering from PTSD. We have exposed several egregious cases to the media, built nationwide pressure through public campaigns, circulated petitions nationwide that garnered thousands of signatures, organized thousands to call and email the Ft. Lewis command, and worked with military family members and soldiers to bring real heat to the officers at Ft. Lewis. In conjunction with our efforts, Ft. Lewis also has at its gates the G.I. coffeehouse Coffee Strong, helping soldiers on base learn about their rights and speak out about mistreatment.
It is no coincidence that the target of so much organizing is now the focus of an Army inquiry and firings.
Col. Homas is typical, not just a bad apple
There is nothing unique about the way Colonial Dallas Homas dealt with soldiers suffering from PTSD who were seeking help. Ft. Lewis is one of the most troubled bases in the U.S. military in regards to suicide.
I remember his predecessor, an officer by the name of Col. Edwards at Madigan hospital when I was just starting my medical discharge process. He interviewed me for roughly thirty seconds before he told the doctors I was fit for duty and had to deploy again. This is what is considered adequate for these officers to make a diagnosis that will impact the rest of our lives—or a diagnosis that will be responsible for soldiers losing them.
They excuse their behavior by accusing us of just faking our symptoms because we are lazy—or, “malingering”. The behavior of officers who accuse service members of “malingering” is not uncommon. What strikes me as odd is that the same officers who will put our lives at risk—but don’t deploy themselves—are so untrusting of enlisted soldiers who have been in combat. They call us “fakers” when we come home from a world they will never see.
The suicides that have taken place at Ft. Lewis are a direct result of the failure of the base and its head officer corps to do anything meaningful to address the crisis of PTSD, as if our lives mean nothing to them.
No accountability for ruining countless lives
Col. Homas has been relieved of his duties and will most likely take a position else where continuing his dishonest work. The Army just needed a cosmetic change—Homas will continue working in a plush office, until he retires with a fat pension. That’s “punishment” for an officer who has been directly responsible for soldier suicides and destroyed families.
Let’s just look at this in comparison for a moment.
If an enlisted soldier loses a pair of night vision goggles, they face a dock in pay, extra duty, restriction to the barracks and demotion in rank. We as enlisted face the harshest punishment even for situations completely out of our control (this was shown during our recent successful campaign against the ridiculous lockdown of B Co., 4/9 Infantry).
But when the head of the mental health department on a base that is on the brink of disaster, continues to refuse to diagnose PTSD, calls soldiers “malingerers” and denies them the right to heal which results in the highest suicide rates among all of the CONUS bases, he is simply relieved of his position and sent somewhere else. Col. Homas’s allegiance, like that of the incoming officer, are not to serve the soldiers but to serve the interests of the Pentagon and protect the funds allotted to the Army.
For the countless lives that have been needlessly lost to suicide at Ft. Lewis, and the families who are suffering, Col. Homas and all other officers and doctors involved in the practice of denying PTSD claims should be brought up on criminal charges.
The Pentagon won’t change things—but we can
Col. Mike Heimall, Homas’ replacement, has no allegiance to enlisted personnel and will continue to function as did Col. Homas and other officers in charge before them. They will continue to attempt to sweep the suicide epidemic under the rug. We can expect no meaningful change from the change of command, except what they are forced to do. The officer corps at Ft. Lewis, Madigan and the crony-healthcare system has not only helped facilitate soldiers’ suicides but they have stolen husbands, wives, sons, daughters, friends and loved ones from our lives.
Real change within the military never has nor will it ever come from the top. This change of command is a direct result of our actions as enlisted service members, vets and family and friends to organize and beat the drums of truth. The lies this base spews will continue to kill soldiers who are suffering from untreated PTSD. Ft. Lewis and all those in charge of medical practice who have cheated service members out of their lives should be tried in court and held accountable for their dishonesty that has led to a massive suicide epidemic.
March Forward! is an organization of veterans and active-duty service members affiliated with the ANSWER Coalition.
www.MarchForward.org – info@MarchForward.org – 213-251-1019
Click here to unsubscribe. If you have problems unsubscribing, send an emailto info@MarchForward.org with the word “Unsubscribe” in the subject line.