Rank Afghan Injustice October 25, 2008Posted by rogerhollander in Canada, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Tags: Afghanistan and Taliban, Afghanistan Injustice, Afghanistan Karzai corruption, Afghanistan politics, Afghanistan War, Canada and Afghanistan, cost of Afghanistan war, Harper agenda, Harper and military spending, Harper Bush, Harper defence budget spending, Karzai government, roger hollander
add a comment
The final sentence of this editorial is: “Canada’s troops are not fighting and dying in Afghanistan to make the place safe for religious zealots who hold human life in low regard.” Unfortunately this is exactly what Canadian troops are fighting and dying for (not to mention the terrorization of the civilian population and the destruction of what is left of the infrastructure). The vast majority of Canadians want our troops OUT OF AFGHANISTAN. Unfortunately, the minority Harper government (38%) continues to ignore the will of the Canadian people in this as well as so many other areas. In the case of Afghanistan it is a simple ideological romance with George W. Bush and the neo-fascist neo-cons who have hijacked that country’s government as well.
Toronto Star Editorial
October 24, 2008
Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government is spending $30 million or more in Afghanistan to “protect and promote” human rights and to “strengthen the rule of law” by training judges, prosecutors and public defenders. It is part of our $1.3 billion Afghan aid program.
But Canada’s effort to help modernize the legal system has been cast in doubt by the disturbing case of Sayed Perwiz Kambakhsh, a 23-year-old journalism student who was condemned to death earlier this year by a court in Mazar-e-Sharif after a five-minute trial.
He had been accused of blasphemy against Islam for raising questions in a university class about Islamic attitudes toward women’s rights, and for distributing an Internet article that asks why Islam isn’t modernized to ensure equality of the sexes.
In Afghanistan, blasphemy is punishable by death. This week an appeals court reduced the sentence to 20 years. Kambakhsh’s family contends local warlords instigated the charges against him because his brother, also a journalist, had angered them with critical articles.
However this murky travesty of justice plays out, the Harper government ought to issue a strong protest. Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who can pardon criminals, should be told that Canadian taxpayers cannot be expected to fund a “justice” system that can condemn someone to death after a quickie trial, with inadequate defence, for raising basic questions about human rights in a university classroom.
This looks more like the Taliban than any court Canadians would recognize as such. Canada’s troops are not fighting and dying in Afghanistan to make the place safe for religious zealots who hold human life in low regard.
Harper and the Militarization of Canada October 7, 2008Posted by rogerhollander in Canada.
Tags: Canada, Canadian Election 2008, Harper agenda, Harper and military spending, Harper Bush, Harper campaign, Harper defence budget spending, militarization of Canada, roger hollander, Stephen Harper
add a comment
Bulking Up Pentagon North
Toronto Star, October 7, 2008
With the prospect of a Harper majority hanging menacingly over the country, the mind inevitably turns to the question: Just what is the “secret agenda” lurking behind the friendly sweater?
Actually, I don’t believe there is one. The truth is that Stephen Harper has already laid out an agenda that would fundamentally change this country – in ways most Canadians would oppose.
While this agenda is not “secret,” my guess is few Canadians know about it. That’s because Harper, realizing it would be unpopular, unveiled it when Canadians weren’t paying attention – in fact, we were sleeping. Sometime in the dark of night last June 20, the Harper government posted a plan on the Department of National Defence’s website – called Canada First Defence Strategy – to spend an eye-popping $490 billion over the next 20 years on the military.
Given all the recent buzz about the size of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout in the United States, it’s striking to note that Ottawa quietly announced a plan to spend nearly half a trillion dollars on the military, almost in passing.
Steven Staples, a defence analyst with the Ottawa-based Rideau Institute, says that Canada’s military spending is already 27 per cent higher than in 2001.
“The focus of the defence lobby now is on getting contracts signed as quickly a possible,” Staples said in an interview. “They want to make it impossible for future governments to get out of these spending commitments.”
It’s hard to imagine an agenda with more profound consequences for Canadians, beginning with a dramatic reordering of national priorities. Public health care? Child poverty? Fighting global warming? Fine causes, to be sure, but sadly the cupboard will be bare.
The Conservatives won’t even have to look mean-spirited as they say no. There just won’t be any money left. It will all be sucked into bulking up Pentagon North.
Harper knows Canadians would balk at this shift in priorities, if they got wind of it. In a 2008 pre-budget survey conducted for the finance department, Canadians were asked which of 18 different issues they considered a high priority. “Increasing spending on defence” ranked last.
There’s a rich irony in this ramped-up military spending. In the election campaign, Harper has accused Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion of “reckless spending” for his plan to invest $70 billion in infrastructure over the next 10 years.
Meanwhile, Harper claims to be a thrifty economic manager, even as he quietly plans a massive spending spree on military hardware.
Clearly governments can rack up deficits just as quickly acquiring tanks and killing insurgents in Afghanistan, as they can building public transit or a clean energy grid here in Canada.
While the election campaign has focused on economic issues, the military and its combat role in Afghanistan have actually been the centrepieces of the Harper administration.
Harper has tried to reshape the way Canadians think about Canada, weaning us off our fondness for peacekeeping (and medicare, for that matter), and getting us excited about being a war-making nation, able to swagger on the world stage in the footsteps of the Americans.
In fact, the U.S. has shown where big military spending leads. As the “defence” sector expands, jobs and economic prosperity become linked to war preparation. A bulging defence sector becomes a built-in constituency for war.
Forget trying to figure out Harper’s “secret agenda.” The really frightening, far-reaching agenda Harper has in mind for us is already posted on the Internet.